Skip to content
EventProcurement.co.uk
Case study · Placeholder

Consolidating Event Spend Across Departments

How a multi-department organisation brought fragmented, independently-sourced event purchasing into one framework. [Figures below are placeholders.]

Placeholder case study
This is an illustrative case study template. All figures, quotes and outcomes shown are placeholders marked [INSERT ...] and do not represent a real client. Replace them with genuine, verified results before publishing.
[INSERT]
Annual event spend
e.g. £X.Xm
Example
[INSERT]
Suppliers before → after
Example
[INSERT]
Departments unified
Example
[INSERT]
Estimated saving
Example

The challenge

[INSERT CLIENT CONTEXT] operated with event spend distributed across [INSERT DEPARTMENTS], each sourcing venues and suppliers independently. There was no consolidated view of total spend and no shared supplier base — the classic pattern described in our guide to consolidating event spend.

Existing procurement model

Before the engagement, events sat outside category management. [INSERT: describe how sourcing happened — e.g. individual bookings, no PSL, duplicated suppliers, limited benchmarking]. Procurement had little visibility of the category.

Our approach

  1. 1
    Spend analysis
    We ran an event spend analysis to establish the baseline. [INSERT KEY FINDINGS].
  2. 2
    Supplier mapping
    We identified overlap and duplication across departments. [INSERT NUMBER] suppliers were delivering similar services.
  3. 3
    Consolidation design
    We designed a right-sized supplier network and a preferred supplier programme.
  4. 4
    Negotiation
    We renegotiated on aggregated volume. [INSERT OUTCOME].

The solution

A single sourcing route now covers [INSERT SCOPE], with consistent contracting and central reporting. Repeat suppliers (such as AV and production) were rationalised, while teams kept full venue choice — sourced through one route rather than restricted to a fixed list.

Commercial outcome

[INSERT COMMERCIAL RESULT — e.g. negotiated savings, reduced supplier count, improved terms]. Clearly evidence figures against a baseline agreed with finance.

Operational outcome

[INSERT OPERATIONAL RESULT — e.g. faster sourcing, reduced duplicated onboarding, single point of visibility for procurement].

KPIs

KPIBeforeAfter
Active suppliers[INSERT][INSERT]
Spend under management[INSERT][INSERT]
Central reporting[INSERT][INSERT]
Negotiated savings[INSERT][INSERT]

Client testimonial

[INSERT CLIENT TESTIMONIAL — a genuine, attributable quote from the client sponsor.][INSERT NAME, JOB TITLE, ORGANISATION]
FAQs

Frequently asked questions

Are these figures real?
No — this is a placeholder template. All figures and quotes are illustrative and must be replaced with verified client data before publishing.
How long does consolidation take?
It varies, but quick wins often come within weeks and a full framework over a few months. See how to consolidate event spend.

More case studies & services

Request an Event Procurement Review

Find out where your organisation's event spend is going, how events are currently sourced, and whether one central sourcing route could save your teams time and give procurement clearer visibility — without restricting venue choice.